=?US-ASCII?B?UmU6IFtTVk5dQWN0aW9uc2NyaXB0MzogQ29kZUNvbXBsZXRpb24sIGV0Y+KApg==?=

[Simon Gregory]

Apologies for my previous messages lack of subject field. I'm reposting here (and cursing my webmail client)

On Tue May 15 12:53 , 'Thomas Aylott (subtleGradient)' <oblivious at subtlegradient.com> sent:
> You've done some awesome awesome stuff! :D

:)

>Bracketed version of the language [...]
>Is anyone else interested in having that option available?[..]

Possibly...

>Or should it be in the main language and people can choose their theme to either show it or hide it.
>This option would let us make some more precise assumptions for some commands/snippets.CodeCompletion

If it gives us finer control then I'm all for it.

>Right now there seem to be 3 codecompletion commands in the core actioscript3 bundle.
>Personally I hate having to choose, I'd like it to just pick the best option depending on context.

Agreed, this is on my TODO list, but if you get there first then that'd be great.

>We could simply add a scope for any line that starts with import.

I'd like a looser scope (so I don't have to type import). However this would be fine, I'm planning on developing a add import 
command which would look up the import then place the line in the imports list automatically. But there's a lot of other things 
TODO first.

>I'm so glad I added that feature to my codecompletion library ;) 
>I knew it'd come in handy

Thank you for the library !

>There are some other random things in the syntax that I'd like to see improved.

>Things that I can do:
>Adding a scope for lines that begin with import
>Combining the import completion commands
>Adding a bracketed version of the language
>Minor syntax tweaks/additions
>
>I really don't want to step on anyones toes and I want to do things that will improve this stuff for everyone.

Don't worry, leap in, improve, we can argue later if we really need to...