[SVN] RFC: async window support for tm_dialog
Allan Odgaard
throw-away-1 at macromates.com
Wed Nov 29 04:23:57 UTC 2006
On 29. Nov 2006, at 04:08, Chris Thomas wrote:
>> 2) should --wait-for-input only return the arguments given to
>> returnArgument:… or the full data model? Here I wouldn’t say we
>> _always_ want the former, but 99% of the time, we would.
> Yes, I'd rather have the returnArgument: arguments. We can add
> something later if the full data model should be needed.
Okay, let’s do that then -- and should the need ever arise, a new
argument can be introduced to tm_dialog.
> My TODO list is these changes:
>
> • --async-window return only the token, not a full plist
> • --list-windows
> • --wait-for-input as described above, returning on returnArguments:
>
> Plus demo scripts and Ruby wrapper.
Great! My plane departs in 12 hours, so this will probably be my last
input.
More information about the textmate-dev
mailing list