[SVN] RFC: async window support for tm_dialog

Allan Odgaard throw-away-1 at macromates.com
Wed Nov 29 04:23:57 UTC 2006


On 29. Nov 2006, at 04:08, Chris Thomas wrote:

>>   2) should --wait-for-input only return the arguments given to  
>> returnArgument:… or the full data model? Here I wouldn’t say we  
>> _always_ want the former, but 99% of the time, we would.
> Yes, I'd rather have the returnArgument: arguments. We can add  
> something later if the full data model should be needed.

Okay, let’s do that then -- and should the need ever arise, a new  
argument can be introduced to tm_dialog.

> My TODO list is these changes:
>
> • --async-window return only the token, not a full plist
> • --list-windows
> • --wait-for-input as described above, returning on  returnArguments:
>
> Plus demo scripts and Ruby wrapper.

Great! My plane departs in 12 hours, so this will probably be my last  
input.




More information about the textmate-dev mailing list