[SVN] Punctuation Scope

[Mietek Bąk]

On 20/8/2006, at 9:27, Michael Sheets wrote:

> Ok, here is a totally redone version. Changes too numerous to  
> mention so just look it over, comment, etc.

1.  I don't really see the difference between  
"punctuation.delimiter.block" and "punctuation.delimiter.section".   
I'm in favor of collapsing "section" into "block", since "block"  
sounds nicer.

2.  I'm of the opinion that "punctuation.delimiter" is actually  
redundant.  It seems obvious to me that punctuation characters are  
used to delimit things.  Do we really need excessively wordy scope  
names?  "punctuation.delimiter.separator" is even more redundant.

3.  How would you scope the single quotes in a single-quoted Erlang  
atom (equivalent to a Lisp or Ruby symbol)?  'This is an example'.   
Note that this definitely has nothing to do with a string.


-- 
(desp)