[SVN] Revision 959 (C)

[Chris Thomas]

On May 18, 2005, at 2:43 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:

> • Changed the “#pragma mark”-rule to not use a condition in the  
> regular expression (since this is no longer supported) -- I'm not  
> sure why it did use this condition.

Because it has to handle other "pragma" lines as well, otherwise the  
pragma might get eaten by the keyword.preprocessor rule, since we  
don't control order of precedence (that I'm aware of). The  
conditional says: if this is "#pragma mark", the text following it as  
"declaration.section", otherwise do nothing. It handles all pragma  
preprocessor lines. (Looks like it's incorrectly highlighting  
comments as preprocessor lines, however.)

(Of course, then "pragma" should also be deleted from the  
keyword.preprocessor rule, which I thought I did, but I find no  
evidence of now.)

It might actually be simpler to fold the pragma mark support into the  
main keyword.preprocessor rule.

Chris