just wondering, what does slickedit's *editor* have that textmate doesn't? I played around with it for a trial period and eventually decided to stick with textmate, because i found all the same editor features and a much nicer native interface (and i'm pretty intolerant when it comes to non-native interfaces so it was worth losing the ide features).

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Timothy Reaves <treaves@silverfieldstech.com> wrote:
> Yes . . . please . . . when Allan gets the Alpha done he gets it done.
>
> Besides I have to ask the question.  If TextMate is so good (which it is)
> why is everyone so impatient for TM2?  Yes it will probably be better then
> TM1 and more scalable, but TM1 is great as is.
>
> If anything the bigger question would be for the windows users wondering
> when TM is going to be coming to there platform?  Besides E-text Editor
> which works pretty good.  But I was a little put out when they wanted to
> charge for a product that was still in Beta.
>
> --snip--

Because TextMate isn't that great.  It being a good (arguably the best) OS
X programmers editor doesn't mean it's great.  SlickEdit, if it was native
Cocoa instead of X, would be much, much better.

So those of use waiting for a version 2 hope that the many issues, both
visual and functional, with finally be fixed.  Then maybe it'll be a great
editor.


_______________________________________________
textmate mailing list
textmate@lists.macromates.com
http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate