<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16939" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV dir=ltr align=left>
<HR tabIndex=-1>
<FONT face=Tahoma size=2><B>From:</B>
textmate-bounces+dru=summitprojects.com@lists.macromates.com
[mailto:textmate-bounces+dru=summitprojects.com@lists.macromates.com] <B>On
Behalf Of </B>brad tittle<BR><B>Sent:</B> Friday, December 04, 2009 7:44
AM<BR><B>To:</B> textmate@lists.macromates.com<BR><B>Subject:</B> [TxMt] Re:
textMate 2.0<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV>The reason I went back to a mac yet again was to get textMate. There is a
version for PC out there if you do a search for PC Version of textMate that
seems to support all the bundles.</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=481283817-04122009>--------------------------------------------------------------------------</SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=Arial><FONT color=#0000ff><FONT size=2><SPAN
class=481283817-04122009> </SPAN></FONT></FONT></FONT><BR></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=481283817-04122009><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I have
heard not-so-nice things about "e" (if that's the "PC Version of TextMate" you
speak of). I know two people who've tried it, and neither found it
terribly usable. Bundle support was shaky at best, and just in general not
the experience they wanted. Both have switched to the Mac and are proper
TextMate users now.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></BODY></HTML>