[TxMt] Re: a small delightful feature has gone missing, I think

Allan Odgaard mailinglist at textmate.org
Thu Nov 20 08:23:17 UTC 2014


On 20 Nov 2014, at 2:44, Matt Neuburg wrote:

> But I don't understand how you make the leap from "this is the type of 
> the file" (using some sort of scope) to "this is the extension that 
> new file names should have". I don't see anything there about a file 
> extension, which is what I'm after. m.

When you set the file type to `text.asciidoc` then TextMate will use the 
first extension listed in the grammar for that scope (which should be 
`asciidoc`) when saving (and there isn’t already a name asssociated 
with the document).


More information about the textmate mailing list