[TxMt] Re: file browser behaviour in TM2

[Jerry]

On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:15 PM, John Joyce wrote:

> 
> 
>> I just have to throw my vote in for the curent PANE option, not a weird second-class drawer that doesn't behave like it is really part of the window.
>> 
>> Check out SizeUp (http://www.irradiatedsoftware.com/sizeup/) or BetterTouchTool/BetterSnapTool (http://blog.boastr.net/) if resizing windows is causing an inordinate amount of distress in your lives.  
>> 
>> --  
>> Brandon Fryslie
>> 
>> 
>> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 8:25 AM, Rob McBroom wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sep 12, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Travis Dunn <tdunn13 at gmail.com (mailto:tdunn13 at gmail.com)> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I don't think the new file browser is "stupid" at all, if anything it's more inline with how most other editors handle the problem (not saying that TextMate can't/shouldn't be unique), but in this case I think it was a good decision. The drawer was awkward in my opinion, it's pretty much the only reason I used Project Plus, cause the interface element felt strange.
>>> 
>>> I used Project Plus, too. I don?t think anyone wants a literal drawer.

I do. This is an excellent application of a drawer.

>>> We just want the size of the editing area to be the same, whether [thing that shows files] is visible or not. :-)

Yes, that's the main thing.

Jerry
> 
> I like the drawer in TM 1. It is very OS X and Cocoa apps had drawers for a long time.
> In a perfect world, everybody wants different things, and everyone wants a customizable text editor. 
> So, it would be great to have all 3 options... (but a PITA to code and maintain, perhaps...)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> textmate mailing list
> textmate at lists.macromates.com
> http://lists.macromates.com/listinfo/textmate

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20120913/7c9d157b/attachment.html>