[TxMt] Re: Patch to blogging bundle to enable custom fields
mailinglist at textmate.org
Sat Dec 6 11:39:25 UTC 2008
On 28 Nov 2008, at 23:58, Michael Tyson wrote:
> I'm not entirely sure if it's WP-specific - it's certainly not part
> of the MT spec, from what I understand.
> WP provides for multiple values for the one key, which is why the
> numeric ids are there; if no ID is present, WP will create a new
> field, regardless of prior fields with the same key.
> I like your idea of using the x- prefix; perhaps a syntax like:
> x-«field»-«identifier»: «value»
> ..Would provide for the numeric ID? Thoughts?
That sounds good, but I still do not understand the numeric identifier.
It sounds like this is the alternative to provide an array as value?
So instead of:
x-tags: ( foo, bar )
I would do:
Is this correct? Can you give an example of keys where you supply
More information about the textmate