[TxMt] Re: Calling JavaScript Bundle developers

[subtleGradient / Thomas Aylott]

On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:46 PM, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:
> On Feb 9, 2007, at 5:33 PM, subtleGradient / Thomas Aylott wrote:
>
>> I think your option is actually better in the short term.
>> Put it in the default bundle now, but leave out the larger bits.
>> Then make it easy for people to install the larger bits if they  
>> feel so inclined.
>
>> Good plan. Let's do it
>
> One more vote on this as well. Even 2.3MB is quite a lot, given  
> that the whole TM binary is 23MB atm, so we are talking about a 10%  
> increase in the file size, so the binaries should definitely be  
> downloadable somehow. Ideally the user should just have to say YES  
> I WANT THIS SO BAD, or say I ALREADY HAVE IT INSTALLED, HERE IT IS.  
> But if these commands are really so cool, we want them in the main  
> Javascript bundle, no questions about it.
>
> Haris

Agreed.
All the little stuff will be included.
All the big stuff will be downloadable/installable manually and  
eventually automatically.

thomas Aylott — design42 — subtleGradient — CrazyEgg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate/attachments/20070209/d4cb59f1/attachment.html>