[TxMt] Re: POLL: HTML CodeSense?

[Chip Cullen]

I would most definitely welcome such an implementation. I think there
are a lot of people who use Textmate for HTML development that would
love to see this.

Unfortunately, I'm not sure I can help with actual development, as,
well, I only know HTML & CSS and not much else.

I suppose if you needed a tester, I could do that.

Chip

On 8/1/07, Jacob Rus <jacobolus at gmail.com> wrote:
> john wrote:
> > At least basic preliminary support for (X)HTML5 would be nice, stuff
> > like <header>, <footer>, <section>, <article> etc. "Basic preliminary
> > support" as in at least not marked as invalid when used with a proper
> > doctype.
>
> That's a grammar issue, unrelated to what subtleGradient is talking
> about.  But I think TM should probably move to preferring html5 creation
> document creation in the nearish future (over html 4.01 strict, that
> is), as it's backwards-compatible, and better defined.
>
> Is Infininight still planning on making a better HTML grammar? *wink*
>
> -Jacob
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
> http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate
>