[TxMt] Re: POLL: HTML CodeSense?

[Jacob Rus]

john wrote:
> At least basic preliminary support for (X)HTML5 would be nice, stuff 
> like <header>, <footer>, <section>, <article> etc. "Basic preliminary 
> support" as in at least not marked as invalid when used with a proper 
> doctype.

That's a grammar issue, unrelated to what subtleGradient is talking 
about.  But I think TM should probably move to preferring html5 creation 
document creation in the nearish future (over html 4.01 strict, that 
is), as it's backwards-compatible, and better defined.

Is Infininight still planning on making a better HTML grammar? *wink*

-Jacob