Subversion flaw (was: [TxMt] OCaml Syntax Highlighting)

[Allan Odgaard]

On 14/9/2006, at 23:03, William D. Neumann wrote:

> [...] This happened to me a week or so ago, when one of my  
> revisions had to be rolled back because it thought a really old  
> version of the grammar was up to date.  If you run svn up and still  
> have this issue, then if might be best to scrap the lot and do a  
> fresh checkout.

In the interest of sharing, this also just happened for Michael  
Sheets, who thus did similar to an HTML grammar change I’d committed.

This would seem to be a rather serious flaw in svn -- anyone familiar  
with this flaw? i.e. is it known/reproducible/PIBCAC/similar?