[TxMt] Performance issues
eric at aplosmedia.com
Sat May 27 05:42:26 UTC 2006
Amen :) Regardless, I love TextMate and the Job you've done, and I'd
gladly pay for it again.
On May 26, 2006, at 10:40 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
> On 26/5/2006, at 22:46, Timothy Reaves wrote:
>> [...] So when someone asks about performance and whatnot, you
>> can't simply say 'you get what you pay for'
> While I personally would not use such phrase, I don’t see why you
> can’t say such thing about TextMate.
> You pay an indie software developer €39 for a shareware
> application. Did you not get a shareware application worth €39? Let
> me remind you that hiring a software developer to do custom
> development for you will likely cost €100 or more per hour (and I
> doubt you can find anyone who can write something like TextMate in
> less than a year), and it’s not uncommon to pay for support and/or
> upgrades. I currently provide that as a free bonus, and even do
> semi-custom development for you guys.
> I do this of own choosing, so it is not because I expect any
> special gratitude for this gesture, but frankly your statement does
> seem pretty out of place!
>> [...] compared to other similarly complex software, it costs a lot.
> No it does not. Commercial/shareware software of the same
> complexity costs the same or more, sometimes much more. F/OSS is
> hard to compare, but if you think of the high-profile projects like
> Eclipse or Firefox, those projects are backed by companies who
> invest millions of dollars in them (lookup the price for being a
> Mozilla Foundation), even governments have put money into the
> Mozilla project -- and those money do come from somewhere.
> For new threads USE THIS: textmate at lists.macromates.com
> (threading gets destroyed and the universe will collapse if you don't)
More information about the textmate