[SVN] Re: Regular Expressions Grammar

[Chris Thomas]

Pretty sure you can nuke it without harm.

Chris

On Sep 4, 2007, at 9:00 PM, Michael Sheets wrote:

> Was just making sure no one has an objection to removing the Regular  
> Expressions grammar that is in the Regular Expressions bundle. There  
> is a much better version of it in the Textmate bundle so I didn't  
> see any downside but wanted to make sure there wasn't a reason to  
> keep it around.
>
> Would say move the newer one over to the RegExp bundle, but it's not  
> a default bundle and is included from other grammars so it needs to  
> be available and not filtered out.