[SVN] New info.plist keys for description etc.

[Chris Thomas]

On Feb 13, 2007, at 10:08 PM, Thomas Aylott (subtleGradient) wrote:

> On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:56 PM, Allan Odgaard wrote:
>
>> # Status
>>
>> The status of the bundle should probably be something like stable /  
>> unstable. Not entirely sure, especially since we do not branch  
>> development and release bundles.
>
> unstable
> stable
> broken
> abandoned
> crappy (aka. needs updating or something)

Might be useful to orient this toward user contributions:

'abandoned'	(does not have an active maintainer, needs more work/has  
bitrot)
'experimental'	(has active maintainer, needs more work, maintainer has  
immediate plans to rework things)
'needs help'	(has active maintainer, needs more work to be generally  
useful)
'happy'		(has active maintainer, probably feature complete, additional  
tweakage welcome)

'happy' -- 'usable' is probably a better choice. Might be a little  
pejorative one way or the other, though. I think if you have 'stable',  
you  also need 'unstable-but-useful'. But I don't think there exists  
any bundle that I'd consider 'stable,' for various reasons. Ruby  
probably comes closest. But my standard for 'stable' may be  
unreasonably high.

Chris
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate-dev/attachments/20070214/de0373a5/attachment.html>