[SVN] r2829 (Ruby)

[Allan Odgaard]

On 7/3/2006, at 6:13, Charilaos Skiadas wrote:

>> It would be nice to hear from some of those who run things via  
>> RubyMate (webrick, unit tests, or similar) which previously failed  
>> to have their output properly formatted — I have only tested this  
>> with my made-up test cases (calling system() and let that output  
>> something)
> Are you referring to running the unit tests via command-R? (run  
> script)
> If so, the formatting is still not ideal. When there are more than  
> one errors, the second error seems to start right where the first  
> one finished, without moving to a new line. It looks slightly  
> better than it used to though, I think.

The lack of newline might be a problem with the actual thing running  
the unit tests. Could you send me something which show this problem?

Previously though there was the problem, that things which spawned a  
new process, would not have the output from that process shown with  
escaping < and & (entity) escaped, and also someone mentioned lack of  
wrapping.

> On an unrelated note, I've noticed a plethora of very similar  
> snippets in the Rails bundle. Might I suggest we pack them into  
> single commands like we did in the LaTeX bundle? At least for the  
> official version.

I am not sure what the activation scheme should be, and if you can  
deduce the content alone from the abbreviation.

The various Go to … commands though could likely use $TM_SCOPE to  
decide what action should be taken. And the ERB snippets should  
probably be moved out of the Rails bundle.