[SVN] r3649 (Subversion)

[Torsten Becker]

On 7/7/06, Benoit Gagnon <b.gagnon at gmail.com> wrote:
> Uh ? Why should we be consistent with CVS here ? I think naming the
> bundle commands based on the actual SVN command makes much more sense.
>
> I was puzzled the other day looking for "blame" in the bundle. The
> official name of the command is called "blame" and the subversion book
> doesn't even mention the other aliases. You do get to see them as
> alternates if you type "svn blame" though:
>
> blame (praise, annotate, ann): Output the content of specified files [...].
>
> I've never used CVS and it's somewhat confusing to have a different
> name for "svn blame" juste because it happens to be in TextMate where
> it coexists with CVS.
>
> I vote for a revert on this one :)

Well, I also like blame more than annotate (because I have always to
think about how to spell this), maybe some more people could vote here
so we have a democratic foundation to rename this. :)

+1 for rename back to blame

-- 
Torsten