[SVN] Punctuation Scope

[David Powers]

n/m - just realized those are examples of the use... not proposed defaults.
;)


On 8/18/06, David Powers <david at grayskies.net> wrote:
>
> Is the goal of this to pick up anything not explicitely assigned by a
> grammar (a catch-all layer injected in later), or is it meant to replace
> assigning these items in a grammar at all?
>
> -David
>
>
> On 8/18/06, Michael Sheets <msheets at whitefalls.org> wrote:
> >
> > There's been talk for a while now about making a new punctuation
> > 'root' scope for any/all punctuation that isn't specifically
> > something else (not an operator, etc) I've been working out the scope
> > list and have been passing it around on IRC, now it's time to get
> > feedback from the list. It's meant to be a pretty exhaustive list; no
> > real 'other' section but several scopes that are pretty 'loose' in
> > definition, so should be able to adapt to any situation, hopefully.
> > Mentally go through the languages your familiar with to see if it
> > does, etc.
> >
> > http://pastie.caboo.se/9181
> >
> > Comment time :)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > textmate-dev mailing list
> > textmate-dev at lists.macromates.com
> > http://lists.macromates.com/mailman/listinfo/textmate-dev
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.macromates.com/textmate-dev/attachments/20060818/aa0a631e/attachment.html>